Why you shouldn't use Multiple PTR records on a single IP
A "valid" PTR record is one which resolves to a name which resolves back to the address. For this reason, your PTR records shouldn't use names that resolve back to multiple addresses. Reasoning behind all this (read on only if you care): There's no rule in the RFC's saying that there must be a PTR record for every A record, though it is listed as a design goal. It also never says that you can't have multiple PTR records for a given address; unfortunately, doing so creates havoc. The reason for this is the way that records are reported and recognized. Suppose you have multiple PTR records for a given address. Then this happens: 1) A request is made for PTR records for the address, by something trying to verify one of the hostnames. 2) The server treats the set of PTR records in round-robin, "load sharing" the results. In effect, it reorders the records in an essentially random permutation, and reports them all. 3) The requester sees a stack ...